New Delhi, September 22: A local Delhi court on Tuesday rejected Delhi police’s plea for a speedy trial in the Delhi Cantonment case of rape and murder of a minor Dalit girl on grounds that there is a huge pendency in cases related to crime against children.

Additional Sessions Judge Ashutosh Kumar dismissed a plea by the police seeking expeditious hearing in the matter saying that he has 620 pending cases under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act 2012 in his court, including the present one, and several accused are languishing in jail pending trial.

“In view of the huge pendency before this court and the submissions of the defence counsel that they have to attend to their other matters, day-to-day hearing will not be possible in this case. However, this court shall expeditiously hear the case,” he said.

The dalit minor victim had allegedly been raped, murdered and then hurriedly cremated without the parent’s consent a month and a half back in cantonment area of Delhi. The prime accused, a 55-year-old Hindu priest, and three employees of the crematorium claim that the girl died of electrocution while fetching water from a cooler. The four accused are in jail.

The police had on August 28 filed a charge sheet against the prime accused Radhey Shyam and three employees of the crematorium - Kuldeep Singh, Salim Ahmed and Laxmi Narayan - for rape, wrongful confinement, murder, destruction of evidence, and under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Prevention of Atrocities Act.

Investigations revealed that the prime accused – the priest, Radhey Shyam – was a porn addict and also used to regularly get massages from the minor victim.

This is the same case where the police earlier dithered to take appropriate action and only after a lot of protests that the police had reluctantly geared up. Citizens while being concerned of the deteriorating law and order situation in the city-state, especially in terms of crime against women, had condemned Delhi police which is directly under the Union Home Ministry for slow action and had also protested for fast-tracking the case.

Additional public prosecutor Yadvinder Singh, who appeared in the court on behalf of the police, pleaded that fast-tracking the case will bring justice to the victim’s family.

However, counsel of the accused Radhey Shyam contended that the arguments on charge can only begin after the police submit evidence of rape of the minor girl in their supplementary charge sheet.

“There are so many Pocso cases. Why are the police trying to fast-track this case only? The charge sheet was filed within a month and evidence of rape is yet to be proved by them. The accused in this case deserve a fair trial too, one which is not hurried,” he argued, adding that he had other cases to look into and he cannot devote his time only on a single case.

The opposition counsel also moved an application in the court, seeking protection for his client who was being assaulted by the inmates in the prison as well as the jail van. The application also said that there was danger to Shyam’s life because he is receiving life threats from co-inmates.

“Life of the applicant (Shyam) is in danger as some of the co-prisoners physically assaulted him in jail as well while traveling to the court in police van during proceedings in the case and regularly threaten to kill him,” the application said. The judge issued notice to Delhi police seeking their response and posted the case for September 29.